Why Meta Quest is the best VR sets to me? After researching of it anyone can get the reason. The most appreciative thing is that meta quest 3s supports clouds. so, you don’t have to face storage shortness or uninstall games to install some new. I’ll give you a honest review based on the features and benefits of Meta Quest 3S. Gradually you will get reviews on the 3 storage types- 128 GB, 256 GB and 512 GB.
Table of Contents
At first, Meta Quest 3 or Meta Quest 3S (Best VR sets for now)
After spending over 5 months, with some best VR sets, I’m giving you a honest review on Meta Quest VR sets. To give you’ll a knowledge about it, now I want to tell about Meta Quest VR box- 3 and Meta Quest VR box- 3S, which is best now.
| Meta Quest VR Box: 3 | Meta Quest VR Box: 3S |
| It’s display technology and pancake lenses, which are significantly thinner and crisper. | It’s Fresno lenses as same as the version 2 and you need to carefully align your eyes to see things clearly. |
| 2064*2208 (1.3* more pixels) | 1832*1920 |
| The quest 3 can smoothly adjust 53mm and 75mm | The quest 3S’s fixed positions: 58mm, 63mm and 68mm |
| The meta quest VR box 3 has a headphone jack. | The meta quest VR box 3S doesn’t have any headphone jack |
The advantages of this Meta Quest 3S: Why you can choose it as the best VR sets
- It’s first and obvious one is the price which will feel you that it is the best VR sets. The 3S starts at just $299 for the 128GB and $499 for the 512GB, make it $200 cheaper than the quest 3.
- The advantage of meta quest 3S VR box is that it exactly uses the processor which is found in the 3. It’ll give you a better gaming performance and the graphics compared to the quest 2.
- The Quest 3S’s speaker sound is better than the Quest 3 simply. Because they have a bit more bass and oomph to them
- The Quest 3S’s interface is more reliable than the quest 3. The Quest 3’s interface can sometimes feel a bit more junky.
- It’s pushing more pixels with that higher resolution display.
The disadvantages of why you can’t choose it as the best VR sets
- You have to purchase it depending of how many games you want to play and have installed on them on one time. It’s actually pretty easy to fill up 128GB worth of storage. Games like Batman Arkham Shadow are around 20GB in size. So, for some it might be worth it to set up that storage to 256GB where you’re only $100 away from the quest 3’s price.
- The quest 3S border on almost sounding too muffled compared to the clear sound that you get in the quest 3.
- There are still some motion sickness that I found in the quest 3.
Why this extra $200 for meta 3 ( Meta Quest 3S $299- Meta Quest 3 $499)
- The better displays.
- Improved lenses.
- Similar design do make for a noticeably better experience
- Better battery life
Meta Quest 3s 512GB — The Most Powerful Quest — Ultimate Mixed Reality Experiences — Get Batman: Arkham Shadow and a 3-Month Trial of Meta Quest+ Included
Meta Quest 3s- 128GB: The Best VR Sets With The Best Price
Meta Quest 3S 128GB — Get Batman: Arkham Shadow and a 3-Month Trial of Meta Quest+ Included — All-in-One Headset | $299
Meta Quest 3S best VR sets: A Game-Changer in Affordable Mixed Reality Gaming
Mixed reality gaming has reached a new audience with the Meta Quest 3S, a cost-effective alternative to the pricier Quest 3. Starting at just $299.99, the Quest 3S makes immersive gaming more accessible without sacrificing key features that elevate it above older models like the Meta Quest 2. There are some reason for Meta Quest being the best VR sets.
Design and Build
While similar in appearance to the Quest 3, the 3S makes a few compromises to achieve its lower price point. It swaps out the advanced pancake lenses of the Quest 3 for the older Fresnel lenses, resulting in a narrower field of view and slightly reduced resolution. Despite these changes, the Meta Quest VR box 3S still delivers solid visual performance with its 1832 x 1920 display and a field of view that remains immersive. The design makes it the best VR sets ever to the meta users.
The Meta Quest VR sets design tweaks include repositioned tracking sensors and a simplified action button for switching between virtual and mixed reality modes. While it lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack, the overall ergonomics remain comfortable for extended use. It supports the cloud so that you can easily install any games you want to play. And that makes it the more powerful..
Performance and Features
As the best VR sets Meta Quest got my Equipped with the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 platform, the Quest 3S matches the Quest 3 in raw power. This allows for smooth gameplay across VR and mixed reality experiences, even with demanding titles like Asgard’s Wrath 2 and Blade and Sorcery: Nomad. Impressively, the 3S’s lower resolution gives it an edge in maintaining higher frame rates and conserving battery life, providing up to two hours of playtime on a single charge.
One standout feature is its 4-megapixel full-color pass-through cameras, enabling a seamless blend of real and virtual environments. This allows users to scan and incorporate their physical surroundings into games, making activities like boxing or zombie survival feel more interactive and engaging.
Room for Improvement
The Quest 3S inherits some limitations from the Quest 2, particularly in its lens technology. Its limited IPD adjustment range and three fixed modes make fine-tuning clarity and comfort challenging for some users. Additionally, the older lens design introduces minor optical distortions and lacks the sharpness of newer headsets.
Verdict
The Meta Quest 3S is a stellar entry-level mixed reality headset, bridging the gap between the Quest 2 and Quest 3. Its affordability, coupled with strong performance, makes it the best VR sets with an excellent choice for newcomers and those upgrading from older models. Despite a few trade-offs, it delivers a versatile, high-quality VR experience at a fraction of the cost.
For more in-depth VR coverage and to get more informations about the best VR sets check out our reviews of other leading headsets like the PlayStation VR2!
Is the Meta Quest 3 better than the Apple Vision Pro?
At least in that Zuck comparison, the Meta Quest 3 are victorious in all aspects in which the CEO measures his device with the new gadget, signed by Apple, which has been on sale since this month. In his video, Zuck briefly lays out the benefits of Meta’s mixed reality solution, taking care to emphasize that Meta’s product is better in terms of price, comfort, ergonomics, and even everyday functions.
The video appeared on Mark Zuckerberg’s official Instagram profile (below) and was taken directly from his own Quest 3 headset via the high-resolution camera used for the passthrough. In the clip, which is quickly going viral, Zuckerberg can be seen immediately challenging, stating that before the test he was convinced that the Quest 3 would turn out to be a better option in terms of overall value, being seven times cheaper: 569 euros (609 dollars at the exchange rate) compared to about 3,300 euros (which is about 3,500 dollars).
However, after testing the Apple Vision Pro, observing and practically touching each and every one of the functions of the new gadget, the verdict becomes even more peremptory: “I think the Quest 3 is the best product, period.” Zuckerberg also points out that the Quest 3 performs better with all the mixed reality functions that can normally be used in everyday experience and adds that it is also more ergonomic and comfortable to wear thanks to its lower weight of 120 grams. At least, it has no cables (the battery is integrated) and offers a wider visual angle, although with a lower resolution of the screens, as we have already told you at another time.
Zuckerberg has described the interface created by Apple as “good” and referred to the eye-tracking function as “nice”, but he assures that the Quest 3 proves to be superior to the Apple Vision Pro thanks to its more precise hand tracking. . Finally, the Facebook co-founder returns to the issue that has to do with price, arguing that many people consider the Vision Pro superior, simply because they are more expensive than his equipment. He then points out that he is sincerely surprised that the Quest 3 is a better device and, above all, based on an open model.
And, well, the two companies are competitors. Mark Zuckerberg’s opinion was more than predictable in these circumstances, given the enormous and complicated bet (failed?) of the Metaverse, but there has been no shortage of critical opinions about the Apple Vision Pro, and the coming months will provide the first data on the success end of Apple’s bet.
Apple Vision Pro vs. Meta Quest 3: A Comprehensive Comparison to know about the best VR sets
The launch of Apple’s Vision Pro has sparked debates about how it stacks up against the Meta Quest 3, two of the most talked-about mixed reality headsets on the market. After spending weeks with the Vision Pro and extensively testing the Quest 3, I’ll break down the key differences between these two devices. From hardware to ecosystem advantages, here’s everything you need to know.
1. Comfort and Weight
The most noticeable difference between the two headsets is their weight. The Meta Quest 3 weighs 515 grams, while the Apple Vision Pro ranges from 600 to 650 grams, depending on its light seal and headband configuration. While the weight disparity may seem minor on paper, the difference becomes evident during extended use. Wearing either headset for more than 20 minutes highlights the Vision Pro’s additional heft, making the Quest 3 a more comfortable option for prolonged sessions.
Apple’s design also includes over 20 customizable light seals for a personalized fit. However, its face-scanning process to determine the best fit doesn’t always work as intended. In contrast, the Quest 3 simplifies the process with a universal facial interface, reducing setup complexity.
2. Controllers vs. Hand Tracking
The Quest 3 includes controllers by default, making it ideal for immersive gaming. These controllers are precise and allow for a wide range of gaming experiences. Apple takes a different approach with the Vision Pro, relying on eye-tracking and hand gestures for input. While Apple’s hand tracking is remarkably accurate, the reliance on eye tracking for selection may take some getting used to.
The Vision Pro supports wireless controllers like the PlayStation 5 controller, but the gaming library is limited. Without third-party solutions or cloud gaming workarounds, the Vision Pro struggles to compete with the Quest 3 in terms of immersive gaming experiences.
3. Gaming Experience
For gaming enthusiasts, the Quest 3 is the clear winner. For searching a best VR sets, Meta has years of experience building a robust VR ecosystem, resulting in a more extensive library of games and applications. These games are often designed with immersion in mind, making players feel like they’re part of the action.
The Vision Pro, on the other hand, leans heavily on its spatial computing capabilities. While games like What the Golf and Fruit Ninja leverage spatial features, many titles are still 2D games projected onto a virtual screen. This makes the Vision Pro feel more like a tool for casual gaming rather than a dedicated VR gaming device.
4. Operating System and Ecosystem
Meta’s Quest OS offers more flexibility, allowing users to sideload apps through platforms like SideQuest. This open ecosystem enables users to explore applications beyond Meta’s official store. Features like PlayStation Remote Play and Microsoft Remote Desktop further enhance its versatility.
Apple’s visionOS, while polished, is a more closed ecosystem. Users are limited to Apple’s App Store for software downloads. However, visionOS shines in its integration with the Apple ecosystem, enabling seamless access to iCloud Photos, iMessages, and Mac windows. This makes the Vision Pro as the best VR sets with an excellent companion for Apple users.
5. Display Quality
The Vision Pro boasts micro-OLED displays with a resolution comparable to 4K TVs. These high-resolution displays deliver crisp visuals, making movies and videos look stunning. In contrast, the Quest 3’s display feels more like 720p, with a noticeable “screen door” effect that detracts from the viewing experience.
For immersive videos and movies, the Vision Pro offers a theater-like experience. However, its weight and fit limitations make it less appealing for extended viewing sessions.
6. Field of View and Lens Quality
The Quest 3 offers a slightly better field of view (FoV) and less reflective lenses than the Vision Pro. The Vision Pro’s lenses are prone to glare, particularly in darker scenes, which can be distracting when consuming content.
7. Accessibility for Glasses Wearers
Glasses wearers will find the Quest 3 more accommodating. Its facial interface adjusts easily to fit glasses. The Vision Pro, in contrast, requires users to purchase Zeiss optical inserts, adding $100–$200 to its already steep price.
8. Multi-User Support
The Quest 3 supports multiple profiles, allowing up to three additional Meta accounts on a single device. This makes it easy to share the headset among family or friends. The Vision Pro lacks multi-user functionality, and even if Apple introduces it, each user would need a separate light seal, which costs $200 each.
9. Portability and Battery Design
The Quest 3 features an integrated battery, making it a self-contained device ideal for active VR experiences like fitness. The Vision Pro, on the other hand, uses an external battery pack, which can feel cumbersome during extended use.
10. Price
Perhaps the most significant factor in this comparison is price. The Meta Quest 3 starts at $499, making it accessible to a broader audience. The Apple Vision Pro, however, starts at $3,500, with configurations reaching $3,899 for 1TB of storage. For many, this price difference makes the Quest 3 the more practical choice.
Vision Pro’s Strengths
Despite its limitations, the Vision Pro excels in several areas:
- Display Quality: The Vision Pro’s micro-OLED screens set a new standard for mixed reality visuals.
- Integration with Apple Ecosystem: Features like AirDrop, iCloud synchronization, and continuity make it a seamless addition for Apple users.
- Hand Tracking Precision: Apple’s hand tracking is more accurate than Meta’s implementation, offering smoother interactions.
- Spatial Photos and Videos: The Vision Pro doubles as a 3D camera, creating spatial content with unparalleled depth.
- Build Quality and Design: Apple’s industrial design ensures the Vision Pro looks and feels premium, while the Quest 3’s plastic build feels less refined.
Who Should Buy What?
If you’re primarily interested in gaming, fitness, or budget-friendly VR, the Meta Quest 3 is the better choice. It offers a larger game library, better comfort, and an accessible price point.
On the other hand, the Apple Vision Pro is ideal for Apple enthusiasts who value high-quality displays, ecosystem integration, and cutting-edge features like spatial photos and videos. Its premium price makes it less appealing for casual users, but for those invested in Apple’s ecosystem, it offers an unmatched experience.
Conclusion
The Vision Pro and Quest 3 cater to different audiences. While the Vision Pro VR box is a technological marvel, the Quest 3’s versatility and affordability make it a better choice for most users to get the best VR sets. As both ecosystems evolve, it will be exciting to see how these headsets continue to compete.
To purchase through us please contact.